VIRTUAL TEACHING ASSISTANTS

Custom Unit Planner

Visit the landing page and click on the center button. Upload a text and this assistant will act as a curriculum design engine built to:

• Extract underlying disciplinary skills
• Design coherent, skill-driven unit plans
• Ensure alignment between materials, instruction, and standards

Based on the documents, state standards, resources, and materials you upload, the assistant produces:

  • Standards-aligned unit plan outline (6–10 days)

  • Skill-anchored lesson sequences

  • Clear objectives rooted in disciplinary practices

  • Essential questions focused on cognitive process

  • Vocabulary lists tied to material access

  • Explicit skill-material alignment

  • I operate by 1. Extract Underlying Skills

    From your knowledge documents, I:

    • Identify the 6–10 most important skills required

    • Determine instructional priorities

    • Avoid inventing skills not supported by documentation

    I determine:

    • What students must be able to do cognitively to engage it

    • Which documented skill enables that engagement

    🗂 3. Sequence Instruction Coherently

    I:

    • Scaffold materials across days

    • Move from foundational skill use to more complex application

    • Ensure cognitive progression

    📊 4. Produce Structured Unit Plans

    Every unit includes:

    1. Skill Source Alignment

      • Documents used

      • Skills selected

      • Explanation of relevance to materials

    2. 6–10 Day Unit Table

      • Day

      • Material used

      • Underlying skill (from knowledge docs)

      • Objective & Essential Questions

      • Key Vocabulary

    This structure ensures instructional clarity and accountability.

    3. What I Produce

    I do NOT produce:

    • Random activity lists

    • Theme-only units

    • Vague “engagement ideas”

    • Unaligned lesson sequences

    • Skill sets not grounded in documentation

    4. The Value of What I Produce

    The value lies in instructional coherence and intellectual rigor.

    For Teachers

    • Saves planning time

    • Ensures standards alignment

    • Clarifies cognitive goals

    • Prevents skill drift

    • Supports evaluation readiness

    • Creates defensible instructional design

    For Students

    • Builds transferable disciplinary thinking

    • Makes skills visible and explicit

    • Strengthens reasoning over memorization

    • Deepens engagement with authentic material

    • Develops independence with complex texts and problems

    For Schools / Instructional Leaders

    • Supports vertical alignment

    • Ensures fidelity to state standards

    • Improves assessment alignment

    • Increases instructional clarity across departments

    • Promotes consistency in cognitive expectations

    5. Common Reasons Educators Use Me

    🧪 Science Teachers

    • To build lab-centered units anchored in SEPs

    • To align investigations with Regents or NGSS skills

    • To scaffold complex diagrams, models, or data sets

    📚 ELA Teachers

    • To anchor literary or informational units in analysis skills

    • To design argument-writing sequences

    • To align close reading to documented literacy skills

    🗺 Social Studies Teachers

    • To build document-based inquiry units

    • To align primary source work to disciplinary practices

    • To scaffold causation, comparison, and perspective analysis

    📐 Math Teachers

    • To align modeling tasks with mathematical practices

    • To stage concept development coherently

    • To connect procedural fluency to conceptual understanding

    🎓 Instructional Coaches

    • To improve coherence across lessons

    • To diagnose misalignment between material and skill

    • To strengthen unit rigor and documentation

    6. What Makes Me Different from General AI

    I:

    • Require knowledge documents before planning

    • Extract skills directly from provided documentation

    • Avoid generating unsupported objectives

    • Treat skills as the engine of understanding

    • Design for cognitive architecture, not just engagement

    I function as a curriculum systems architect, not a content summarizer.

    7. In Short

    I help educators move from:

    “What activities should I do?”

    to

    “What disciplinary skill must students use to make meaning of this material?”

    And then I build the instructional pathway that makes that skill visible, teachable, and transferable.

    If you would like, I can also explain:

    • How I determine which 6–10 skills are “most important”

    • How I scaffold materials across days

    • How I distinguish between surface tasks and underlying skills

    • How to use me most effectively when planning a unit